As the future of healthcare remains to be seen, many Americans today are quite unsure about the security of their future insurance coverage. To a large degree the roots of the current US healthcare debate stretch down to a sort of ambivalence which currently pervades the mainstream consciousness. On both sides of the congressional aisle this ambivalence is apparent; Republicans struggle to defend many aspects of the private system in light of the moral implications of populations left out of the current equation, while Democrats tout theoretical ideals of equality that do not seem to validate their choice of government program expansions with no economic foundatoin at the core.
With the seeming lack of congressional leadership in the matter of healthcare, many Americans are beginning to become both frustrated with and confused by the potential future prospects for the currently ailing system. It seems that most of us agree that some degree of change is necessary, but many people are unsure as to what would be the best potential routes for change. One issue at the heart of the health care debate for many people is that of equity. While the U.S. has long enjoyed the best private healthcare system in the world, it has also long been a nation criticized for the lack of equity apparent in the accessibility of the system. Whatever direction the US healthcare system takes in the future, it must address the issue of equitability and must ultimately evolve to reflect the values of the American public, whatever they may be. People want high-quality insurance options, but they also want to ensure that there is some degree of healthcare provided for all citizens. The question that must be answered is ultimately what degree of equity do we as Americans want for our healthcare system.
We as a people must decide what kind of insurance coverage we want for ourselves, as well as for our "neighbors". We must decide what this insurance coverage should include; whether it should be scaled down in the benefits it includes in order to provide coverage to more people at a lower price, or whether their should be gradations of coverage based on people's income levels or levels of need.
One issue which plays a significant role in the health care debate is that of disability coverage. With the questions of the future of healthcare insurance, there are numerous questions of the future of disability insurance and coverage options for people with health issues or pre-existing conditions. In relation to this topic, one particularly interesting health issue is that of hearing loss. Baby-boomers have long been a powerful political force, and as they begin aging, it seems that certain issues are thus becoming more and more prevalent in the mainstream consciousness.
Just as the drug Viagra was covered by Medicare as a result of male baby-boomer power, it seems that many of the aids for hearing loss may become increasingly subsidized by government health insurance as the baby-boomers age. Hearing loss is one of the most common disabilities associated with aging in the general population and while years ago this was simply viewed as a natural impediment to daily quality of life for the aging, the modern technologies of today have given way to numerous aids that can almost completely compensate for the issues associated with hearing loss.
While it is undoubtedly a wonderful aspect of advancing technological innovation, the better equipment now available for people with hearing loss issues also represents an increased healthcare cost. People must be tested for hearing loss at a doctor's office, they then must be diagnosed properly, and finally they must purchase the appropriate hearing aid to suit their lifestyle and needs. With advances in technology leading to wireless FM hearing aids, corresponding microphones, and background noise modifiers, there are more options for those experiencing hearing loss than ever before.
As we all look to how we would like to handle the future of American healthcare coverage, issues such as hearing loss will play a central symbolic role. People will at some point need to decide what kinds of coverage they would like the government to offer them upon retirement, what kinds of services and devices it should cover; then people will need to decide what kinds of covereage they would the government to offer everyone else upon retirement.
For those looking to have utilize their healthcare to the full advantage, consider an investment today in
hearing aids. People still wondering whether or not they may have issues related to hearing loss should consider a
Hearing screening.
Loading...